{"id":30,"date":"2013-05-07T15:52:46","date_gmt":"2013-05-07T14:52:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.iriss.org.uk\/evidenceandpractice\/?p=30"},"modified":"2014-10-02T10:22:16","modified_gmt":"2014-10-02T09:22:16","slug":"what-improves-evidence-use-in-practice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.iriss.org.uk\/evidenceandpractice\/2013\/05\/07\/what-improves-evidence-use-in-practice\/","title":{"rendered":"What improves evidence use in practice?"},"content":{"rendered":"

The notion of evidence-based practice emerged in the early 1990s, first emerging in medicine but spreading across a range of practitioner professions (such as social work and education) (Mullen, 2008). \u00a0\u00a0To a large extent consideration of evidence and practice has lagged behind much more prominent and extensive consideration of evidence-based policy, which was paid considerable attention when New Labour entered government in 1997. Nowadays the concept of being informed by, rather than based on, evidence is more widely accepted, as this recognises the numerous influences on practice (and policy), and the importance of these (public opinion, capacity, local context, individual needs etc). \u00a0Perhaps the terminology is ready for further development however; for instance Nick Andrews (from the All Wales Academic Social Care Research Collaboration<\/a>) recently referred to \u2018evidence-enriched practice\u2019, which seems to be an even better way to express the desired relationship between evidence and practice.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Despite the inevitable evidence gaps (the irony!) there is some evidence about activities which have potential to improve the use of evidence in practice:<\/p>\n