Strong messages from people accessing support also emphasised the importance of seeing past the circumstance of homelessness to the drivers behind it.<\/p>\n
\u201cInstead of asking, \u2018what\u2019s wrong with me?\u2019, ask me what happened.\u2019\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Person-centred criteria<\/h3>\n The team\u2019s criteria was developed in response to two fundamental questions: who are we here to support and what needs do these people have? Building on evidence of homelessness and trauma, the team\u2019s criteria was developed to meet the needs of people experiencing these dual, complex issues. This was identified as a strength of the support provided by the team. The freedom to do this was attributed in part to the fact that the service was new at the time:<\/p>\n
‘It\u2019s brilliant that we have that, but why do we have that? Because it\u2019s a new service, because people thought about it before it was developed. I think if you ask some of these services why they have the criteria that they have, they will say, \u2018Because it\u2019s always been there.\u2019’<\/em><\/p>\nCriteria are important and form the key to accessibility. The criteria of some services can be a barrier and mean that people who don\u2019t fit it can\u2019t access the support they need. The design of the Trauma and Homelessness team turned that on its head:<\/p>\n
‘I think that the Trauma and Homelessness Team are really good at being accessible and I think often mental health services are seen as… there\u2019s lots of barriers to speak to the psychologist or the psychiatrist or to get… or they won\u2019t take certain people, they\u2019ve got a strict criteria \u2026 I think the fact that we adapted our service to meet the complex needs of the client in the ways that we have ; both in service delivery, skill mix, what we offer, the training, consultation, and treatment, the fact that we measure it and we react all the time to the measurement tools, it is pretty unique.’<\/em><\/p>\nFlickr – Mathias Liebing (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe values of the team aimed to align with the reality of people experiencing complex trauma and homelessness rather than to a predetermined model:<\/p>\n
‘… I remember \u2026 having this lovely linear diagram of people having no fixed abode, going into supported accommodation and then enter a temporary furnished flat, then their own tenancy, and it just looked lovely; it went in one direction. The reality when I started was that that wasn\u2019t what people\u2019s journeys looked like; they often moved about; they moved backwards; they moved forward.’<\/em><\/p>\nA core belief of the team’s design was that people experiencing homelessness and trauma could be helped by this intervention, something which was unknown at the time:<\/p>\n
‘…could homeless people engage in what is quite a highly skilled psychological intervention? … we thought they could but we knew that we would have to … change our service model to meet the needs of the service users\u2026’<\/em><\/p>\nFlickr – Todd Huffman (CC BY 2.0)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nPartnership working<\/h3>\n The complex needs of those experiencing trauma and homelessness mean that there can be multiple professionals involved in their support. Good partnerships with the practitioners around a person is a fundamental aspect of the team\u2019s approach and is perhaps unsurprising given the implications of homelessness across the sectors of housing, social services and health. However, importantly, it reinforces the need for a holistic view of the person experiencing homelessness and trauma. It also helps to ensure consistent messages to the supported person. The importance of consistency can\u2019t be underestimated in the support of people living chaotic lives:<\/p>\n
‘…we sit with the whole person in front of us: they don\u2019t just need a psychologist or a mental health service, they need a social worker; they need a psychologist; they need a support worker; they need to have someone at two o\u2019clock in the morning; and we all need to be giving a consistent message. So I think that\u2019s really important, that we\u2019re all one voice.’<\/em><\/p>\nWhile being \u2018one voice\u2019, the team also recognises the importance of the skill mix and different expertise that partnership working harnesses. It\u2019s not about making everyone a trauma expert but instead appreciating everyone\u2019s contribution in supporting the whole person.<\/p>\n
‘They [other professionals] do a great job and they\u2019re highly skilled; they know the service users so much better than we do, so that sense of not flying in experts I think helps hugely\u2026It also helps us do our job because in the supported accommodations and social work it\u2019s not uncommon for them to help our clients attend appointments, so they\u2019ll come along with them or they\u2019ll facilitate… they\u2019ll get them up in the morning. So we all have a role to play on the overall care of the patient, and I think the holistic approach is helpful.’<\/em><\/p>\nPartnership working is a frequently cited enabler of good, effective support. In this case, the team have evidence that partnership working links directly to good engagement with treatment:<\/p>\n
‘We engage fully with everyone else involved in that person\u2019s care so: health; social work; housing officers; support workers, we have a real partnership working approach, and we find that that has increased the engagement \u2026 homeless people who have got complex trauma are sitting at about 69% engagement of treatment, which is pretty good. It\u2019s pretty good for a non-homeless population\u2026’<\/em><\/p>\nFlickr – Archangel12 (CC BY 2.0)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nIn a time of austerity and cuts, there was a strong feeling that a trauma-informed approach to homelessness wouldn\u2019t be possible without the commitment of professionals:<\/p>\n
‘…there\u2019s a passion for helping this population \u2026 there seems to be a genuine interest, whereas it wouldn\u2019t work if people are burnt out … because these people are complex: they take a lot of energy; a lot of work; they don\u2019t fit nicely into the textbooks of \u2018ten sessions\u2019 and then they\u2019re cured; they don\u2019t follow that linear homelessness path; they have crisis; they have addictions… so there\u2019s multiple layers of need…’<\/em><\/p>\nTraining<\/h3>\n A key mechanism for working in partnership starts with the training function of the team. The training is seen as \u2018the starting point\u2019<\/em> to working with people around the supported person and is also backed up by other support-like consultations.<\/p>\nThe aim of the training is not simply to promote the work of the team but to build capacity in other support providers to be more aware of the role of trauma in homelessness.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Given the small size of the team, it makes sense to prioritise capacity-building in other services:<\/p>\n
\u2018…if all the services were trauma-informed, that would be an excellent first step, and then if we could go further than that and have trauma-specific services for these vulnerable groups, that would be wonderful, but I don\u2019t think there\u2019s anything stopping services being trauma-informed.\u2019<\/em><\/p>\nFlickr – Alan Levine (CC BY 2.0)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe team has evidence which suggests that building capacity in other services to be trauma-informed has a positive impact on people accessing support:<\/p>\n
‘…we spend a lot of our time going out and training third sector, social work and health staff in how to identify trauma; how to work with people who have got trauma symptoms who have been traumatised; and also about when and where to go if they need extra help. And that\u2019s been really useful in terms of increasing capacity in other services, and it\u2019s also helped the service user usually because, even by offering consultations to some of the supported accommodation, we find that people are managing to maintain their supported accommodations a lot longer and move through homelessness. So, we have data that shows that people, when we first meet them, can be in no fixed abode or really unstable accommodations and by the time we\u2019re discharging them they\u2019re often within a temporary furnished flat or their own tenancy, which is huge for us.’<\/em><\/p>\nImportantly, the training helps uncover \u2018expectations of each other\u2019<\/em> which was identified as vital to working well across services. However, conversations about expectations are not always easy ones.<\/p>\nWhen asked what facilitated the effectiveness of the training, what was identified was \u2018the openness from other services … to learn, to engage, to work jointly. You can offer the best training in the world but if people sit and don\u2019t listen and don\u2019t want it, then you\u2019re not going to get anywhere…\u2019<\/em><\/p>\nFlickr – Doran (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nPartnership working also has a role to play in the prevention of homelessness. Early intervention is often dependent on the eyes and ears of other professionals. The team\u2019s remit was extended five years ago to also address the risk of homelessness: \u2018…why do we wait until someone\u2019s homeless? Social workers and support workers can tell you \u2018this person is struggling to maintain this tenancy\u2019… it\u2019s reasonable to say \u2018phone us if there\u2019s a risk of homelessness.\u2019\u201d<\/em><\/p>\nEvidence<\/h3>\n Underpinning the team\u2019s approach is measurement and evidence gathering. This was identified as the driver behind change, reflection and improvement. \nThe team gather evidence on a range of measures which they use to steer the treatments, interventions and training they provide:<\/p>\n
‘…we found that 30% of our Trauma and Homelessness Team had a leaving care history, so I used that information to make links with leaving care… but we weren\u2019t getting them until they were maybe in their thirties and had repeated domestic violence situations; had been involved in prostitution; and experienced homelessness…why can\u2019t we get them earlier and therefore try and prevent that? \n<\/em><\/p>\nImportantly, measurement needs to be active, ongoing and purposeful, not for the sake of itself. Part of this means returning to fundamental questions: Who are we? What do we do? Why do we do it that way? How do we know it\u2019s working?<\/p>\n
A key message was to not only ask these questions when developing a service but to ask them regularly and gather evidence to inform the answers. Another part of this means measuring what\u2019s important including outcomes for people who access support.<\/p>\n
Unsurprisingly for the context, measures include symptoms, risk and levels of functioning and mental health and housing outcomes. Evidence from these measures speaks to the impact of the approach. Service reports are also an important source of evidence. Originally produced in response to a high level of scrutiny when the team was first established, these reports provided valuable information about gaps and difficulties in support. They continue to inform the way support is provided through the team.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Case study 1 Description This case study describes a service developed to respond to trauma and homelessness in Glasgow and is based on a discussion with Dr Lisa Reynolds, Consultant Clinical Psychologist and Head of Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GG&C) NHS Trauma Service. The Trauma and Homelessness Team is a mental health team and the … Continue reading Trauma and Homelessness Team (Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Trauma Service)<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iriss.org.uk\/homelessness\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/154"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iriss.org.uk\/homelessness\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iriss.org.uk\/homelessness\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iriss.org.uk\/homelessness\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iriss.org.uk\/homelessness\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=154"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iriss.org.uk\/homelessness\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/154\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iriss.org.uk\/homelessness\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}