{"id":99,"date":"2015-06-30T12:09:03","date_gmt":"2015-06-30T11:09:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.iriss.org.uk\/homelessness\/?page_id=99"},"modified":"2019-03-11T09:04:43","modified_gmt":"2019-03-11T09:04:43","slug":"case-study-take-home-messages","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blogs.iriss.org.uk\/homelessness\/case-study-take-home-messages\/","title":{"rendered":"Take-home messages"},"content":{"rendered":"
The case studies describe the \u2018what\u2019 of a group of approaches to homelessness prevention, but it\u2019s the \u2018how\u2019 that brings them together. They have several mechanisms in common which are outlined as seven take-home messages.<\/p>\n
The case studies describe eight different approaches to addressing homelessness. They look at homelessness prevention through a range of lenses – for example, mental health, relationships, furniture, independent living, education. Seeing homelessness from other angles can bring new perspectives. Opportunities to work across boundaries can emerge, the importance of which was a key theme across the case studies.<\/p>\n
The lens they have in common is a person-centred one where support is designed and tailored to the needs of people and the realities of the challenges they face. The approaches look at homelessness prevention in three broad ways: preventing the first instance of homelessness; preventing repeat episodes of homelessness; and sustaining tenancies. All approaches are interlinked, for example, \u00a0sustaining tenancies can help prevent people becoming homeless, preventing a first instance of homelessness and can help prevent recurring episodes.<\/p>\n There are examples in the case studies of reframing what prevention means.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The focus on relationships and the role of mediation in case study five<\/a> seeks to make a young person\u2019s transition to independent living as safe and planned as possible. This may not mean the risk of homelessness is completely eradicated but that young people are informed about their options, choices and rights if faced with it. Similarly, case study three<\/a> emphasises that sometimes prevention \u2018doesn\u2019t always mean that you are going to prevent someone becoming homeless, but it means that that journey might be a better journey.\u2019<\/em><\/p>\n Stigma is an issue across the approaches. Case study three <\/a>looks at homelessness prevention from the perspective of independent living and life skills.
\nService criteria are\u00a0inclusive rather than exclusive to help ensure accessibility which is seen as the first step to helping people experiencing homelessness (eg case study one<\/a> and two<\/a>). Accessibility, active inclusion and an assets-based approach underpin the person-centred focus exemplified in the case studies.<\/p>\nDe-stigmatise homelessness<\/h2>\n
\nThe team recognised that stigma can stand in the way of young people engaging\u00a0and that the person who delivers the message to young people is important. Other young people talking about independent living is perhaps more effective than a housing officer talking about homelessness.<\/p>\n