According to a recent discussion on BBC Radio 4, leadership at senior manager level means doing things right (focus on efficiency and governance), while at practitioner level it means doing the right thing (focus on effectiveness). It struck me that this lies at the heart of the problem of blocked access to social media.
For the senior manager maybe a focus on efficiency and governance leads to a command and control approach to the organisation’s communication channels. The practitioner’s concern for effectiveness on the other hand might favour the use of informal, decentralised tools for communication. This dichotomy was highlighted at an event run last week by Ayrshire and Dumfries & Galloway Local Engagement Forum (first item on the agenda: a snappier title). The focus of the event was leadership and communication and IRISS was invited to run a workshop on web-based tools.
Over lunch one delegate casually remarked that sometimes ‘communications seem to rain down from above’ creating overload and pressure while at other times there seemed to be a lack of communication. She went on to say something along the lines of
what I’d like is a kind of Facebook type of communication. Where you can see what’s going one, pick up what you need, follow up when you want and contribute when appropriate
Which rather neatly illustrates the role that social media can play in supporting effective communication and sharing.
Workshop participants were really keen on social bookmarking (Delicious in this case) and news feeds (using Google Reader). I think some cynics came round to appreciating Twitter’s value for current awareness and for engaging with a wider network of people and organisations. But, of course, they were frustrated that their organisations would block access (it’s odd than local authorities have embraced Twitter as a channel to engage with communities on things like weather, roads and school closures, but still seem reluctant to accept that it would be even more effective if their staff were allowed to use it).
This is where leadership comes in. Social media is effective, especially when trying to promote engagement between public, private and voluntary sector groups and individuals (as the Forum is trying to do). And many of the tools are free. The task for the delegates is to use their leadership skills to engage in constructive discussion about possible risks and security concerns arising from the use of social media and to make the case for looser controls and restrictions so that they can use these tools to help them do the right thing. As they are all responsible and trustworthy professionals, governed by codes of practice and employment terms and conditions, surely they can also be trusted to do things right? In other words it should be possible to be both efficient and effective.
just a note to say that this is a great wee blog – hopefully we’ll have some action to report soon.
Thanks Gavin. Glad you’re enjoying it! I hope it will contribute to the debate and maybe have some positive impact.
Great post, Ian. It is deflating for people to hear about all the great things social media has to offer them in the way of professional development only to realise access to various sites is blocked by their organisation. I agree that leadership needs to just trust and let people get on with it but often times IT security colleagues are inflexible. It’s easy to bamboozle manager types with scary imaginary scenarios of infrastructures crumbling under the stress of the entire workforce watching YouTube all at the same time, staff spending hours on end updating their Facebook status or tweeting confidential information thus bringing their organisation into disrepute. A lot of our leaders are not as digitally literate as their staff so they’re not equipped to counter security concerns that are maybe a little too cautious for a modern workplace. Staff, and management, should be allowed to explore all information available to them online to allow them to collaborate, learn and to enrich their professional lives. In the end it’s all about how much an organisation trusts their staff, not that the organisation technically can’t handle opening up access.
Yes Leah, I think lack of trust is part of problem. And the lack of trust stems from lack of understanding just how effective social media is for collaboration.
Using a form of social media to let workers know about changes to policy and procedures for example would be really helpful. What happens at present in many places is that the information is sent by e-mail to team managers with the assumption that it will be cascaded down to all staff. This helps to block up a lot of e-mail accounts whereas a social network system would have the information available for people to refer back to without e-mails having been deleted because there were too many. It would also allow people to view the changes without being part of the mechanism for cascading, such as keeping trainers informed of changes taking place if they are not in the line management strand for the cascading to practitioners.
Comments are closed.